Liberal Forum

peepee » 19 Jan 2018 11:24 pm » wrote:

deezer shoove » 19 Jan 2018 3:18 pm » wrote:Was it before 1943? That's when a book was published that I just recently read (at peepee's recommendation).
To paraphrase Harold Ramis in "Stripes", I'm willing to learn...

That's why I don't get the animosity about this. I really don't.
I have to assume his "delicate condition" forces his actions and responses.
OCD manifests itself to individual weaknesses and proclivities. He is OCD about green things, I think..

....your eyes may have glanced at voorhis' words but they have not $unk in yet...hear me now and believe me later...

...you sound like a pathetic wounded animal so let me treat you to a little secret of mine: ...i come here to engage in the/a 'competition of ideas about government' and to kick republicrat-level ***...i have found through much trial and error that the best way to get republicrat-level folks such as yourself to read/engage/respond is to criticize their ignorance, insult them, etc..it really gets the competititive juices flowing in the great 'competition of ideas about government'...simple human nature...

...of course this is not a tactic YOU should employ as to 'the great competition of ideas about money'...you have no 'game'/skill/knowledge here and players like me, cannon, ingo, indago, are always going to beat you up badly/embarrassingly until you arm yourself with some honest knowledge...

So you came here to argue. Got it.
Also to pretend to "help" through insult. Got that, too.

I was honest about this topic from the beginning to several people.
I spoke my mind, clearly indicating an interest of sorts, without claiming expertise.

You want to employ those tactics of **** Chat Room Money Expert?
Go ahead.
I'll lose interest because of your need to appear to win. We don't need to continue.
You have already staked out your version of like-minded experts here. Talk to them.

Maybe you're a millionaire, so extensive is your expertise. Maybe not. Just a bookworm with a fetish...
You have let your people skills ruin our conversation.
Your hubris about being single-minded is unpleasant.

Put me on whatever list you want.
What you think now has become more irrelevant than before I tried showing interest.

You guys always end up at the same place it seems to me. Doing nothing; playing "Misery Loves Company".

CP makes sense when he actually defended you. I backed off my peepee-hates-the-rich ****.
His contention was that you are "agitating for honest money".
As useless as that hobby is, I find his description of you better than anything you have said.

That's why I'd rather give him a shot in the bluster-at-each-other contests here.